Reading a Wide Spread: Market Widening or Something That Stopped — United Arab Emirates
Every figure below was recorded on Exness’s own MetaTrader 5 Standard feed by an in-terminal EA — the spread the platform actually quoted, not a marketing “from 0.0”. Dollar costs default to 0.1 lot, the size most retail accounts actually run — switch to 0.01 or 1.0 below.
A spread that looks too wide is a price before it is a problem. Widening that comes from the market has a recognisable shape: it arrives quickly, it shows up on more than one instrument at the same time, and it narrows again without anything being done about it. A fault on the reading side has none of that shape — one instrument moves while its neighbours do not, or nothing moves at all and the width simply stays where it was. The verdict comes from how the width behaves over the following minute, not from how large it looks in the first second.
Measured spreads — all 23 instruments in one table
| Instrument | Typical | min – p90 | Cost / 0.1 lot | Cost vs daily move | Readings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FX Majors | |||||
| EUR/USDpips | 0.8 | — stable in sample | $0.80 | 2.1% | 29,326 |
| GBP/USDpips | 1 | 0.9 – 1 | $1.00 | 2.2% | 46,261 |
| USD/JPYpips | 1 | — stable in sample | $0.65 | 0.8% | 83,255 |
| AUD/USDpips | 0.9 | — stable in sample | $0.90 | 2.6% | 20,902 |
| USD/CADpips | 1.4 | — stable in sample | $1.01 | 2.6% | 16,970 |
| USD/CHFpips | 1.3 | — stable in sample | $1.60 | 2.9% | 23,874 |
| NZD/USDpips | 1.4 | — stable in sample | $1.40 | 3.5% | 16,766 |
| FX Crosses | |||||
| EUR/GBPpips | 1.3 | — stable in sample | $1.76 | 7.7% | 7,742 |
| EUR/JPYpips | 1.6 | — stable in sample | $1.04 | 1.3% | 49,909 |
| GBP/JPYpips | 2.2 | 2.1 – 2.2 | $1.43 | 1.5% | 59,775 |
| AUD/JPYpips | 1.1 | — stable in sample | $0.71 | 1.3% | 43,769 |
| Metals | |||||
| XAU/USD (Gold)pts | 26 | 24 – 26 | $2.60 | 0.3% | 404,113 |
| XAG/USD (Silver)pts | 3 | — stable in sample | $15.00 | 1.3% | 91,975 |
| Energy | |||||
| US Oil (WTI)pts | 2 | — stable in sample | $2.00 | 0.7% | 352,941 |
| UK Oil (Brent)pts | 4 | 3.3 – 4.2 | $4.00 | 1.1% | 105,712 |
| Indices | |||||
| US500 (S&P 500)pts | 40 | — stable in sample | $0.04 contract size 1 | 0.7% | 205,958 |
| US30 (Dow)pts | 10 | 10 – 13 | $0.10 | 0.2% | 198,487 |
| USTEC (Nasdaq 100)pts | 112 | — stable in sample | $0.11 | 0.3% | 1,438,326 |
| DE30 (DAX)pts | 7 | — stable in sample | $0.08 contract size 1 | 0.3% | 106,076 |
| JP225 (Nikkei 225)pts | 31 | 31 – 34 | $0.00 Quoted in Japanese yen with a contract size of 1 index unit — a small contract, so the dollar cost per lot is naturally low; matches Exness's published contract specifications. | 0.2% | 146,223 |
| UK100 (FTSE 100)pts | 98 | 98 – 300 | $0.13 | 1.1% | 79,563 |
| Crypto | |||||
| BTC/USDpts | 1000 | — stable in sample | $1.00 | 0.4% | 116,911 |
| ETH/USDpts | 100 | — stable in sample | $0.10 | 1.1% | 52,222 |
Typical = the median of all readings. The min–p90 strip shows how far the spread stretched under load; a stable in sample badge means the spread never moved across the whole sample — on Exness Standard many instruments are quoted with stable target spreads, so identical min, median and p90 is expected there, not an error. Forex pairs are quoted in pips; metals, indices, energy and crypto in points — the cost column converts each instrument into the dollar cost of opening the selected lot size at the typical spread. Confidence dots: ●●● at least 2,000 readings, ●● at least 800, ● below that — treat single-dot rows as indicative. Dollar costs differ in magnitude because contract sizes differ: 1 lot of JP225 (Nikkei 225) is a contract of just 1 — a fraction of other instruments’ notional — so a cost of a few cents per lot is genuine, not an error; the “cost vs daily move” column is the fair cross-instrument comparison. Server Exness-MT5Trial11, captured 11 Sep 2026, 07:59 server time.
What this means for a small account
- Lowest entry cost relative to the daily move: JP225 (Nikkei 225) — the spread takes about 0.2% of an average day’s range ($0.00 per 0.1 lot).
- Highest: EUR/GBP — about 7.7% of the daily move is gone on entry; short-term trades there pay a premium on Standard.
- Widest single reading in this sample: GBP/JPY at 30.4 pips around 21:00 server — around the daily rollover — opening positions in that hour costs more.
Spread through the day
Hours are platform server time. Values are printed above each bar; hatched hours were outside this capture window — they are not zero, just not measured yet. Session bands are indicative (summer-time anchors).
Holding overnight — measured swaps
Values shown per 0.1 lot — the lot toggle above rescales this table too.
| Instrument | Long / night | Short / night | Triple day | Held 5 nights (worse side) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | −$0.57 | $0.00 | Wednesday ×3 | −$3.99 |
| GBP/USD | −$0.14 | −$0.14 | Wednesday ×3 | −$0.98 |
| USD/JPY | $0.00 | −$0.86 | Wednesday ×3 | −$6.04 |
| AUD/USD | $0.00 | −$0.18 | Wednesday ×3 | −$1.26 |
| USD/CAD | $0.00 | −$0.59 | Thursday ×3 | −$4.10 |
| USD/CHF | $0.00 | −$1.16 | Wednesday ×3 | −$8.09 |
| NZD/USD | −$0.39 | $0.00 | Wednesday ×3 | −$2.73 |
| EUR/GBP | −$0.58 | $0.00 | Wednesday ×3 | −$4.07 |
| EUR/JPY | $0.00 | −$0.58 | Wednesday ×3 | −$4.04 |
| GBP/JPY | $0.00 | −$1.19 | Wednesday ×3 | −$8.36 |
| AUD/JPY | −$0.01 | −$0.14 | Wednesday ×3 | −$1.00 |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | −$5.36 | $0.00 | Wednesday ×3 | −$37.51 |
| XAG/USD (Silver) | −$4.20 | $0.00 | Wednesday ×3 | −$29.40 |
| US Oil (WTI) | $0.00 | −$18.69 | No triple day | −$93.45 |
| UK Oil (Brent) | $0.00 | −$21.89 | No triple day | −$109.45 |
| US500 (S&P 500) | −$0.15 | $0.00 | Friday ×3 | −$1.02 |
| US30 (Dow) | −$0.96 | $0.00 | Friday ×3 | −$6.71 |
| USTEC (Nasdaq 100) | −$0.59 | $0.00 | Friday ×3 | −$4.12 |
| DE30 (DAX) | −$0.51 | $0.00 | Friday ×3 | −$3.55 |
| JP225 (Nikkei 225) | $0.00 | $0.00 | Friday ×3 | $0.00 |
| UK100 (FTSE 100) | −$0.26 | $0.00 | Friday ×3 | −$1.81 |
| BTC/USD | −$1.61 | $0.00 | Friday ×3 | −$11.26 |
| ETH/USD | −$0.05 | $0.00 | Friday ×3 | −$0.36 |
Read from the platform’s contract specifications at the same capture (2026-09-11). Negative = a nightly charge, positive = a nightly credit; on the triple-swap day three nights are applied at once. “Held 5 nights” counts 7 charges where the instrument has a triple-swap day — a Monday→Saturday hold crosses it once; energies (US Oil, UK Oil) have no triple day, so five nights mean five charges — the realistic cost of a week-long position, not the per-night teaser. See swap rates for how swaps work.
What will this position cost?
Swap charges assume the worst case: each run of 7 nights crosses one triple-swap day; energies (US Oil, UK Oil) have no triple day and charge once per night. Figures combine the measured entry spread with the captured swap for the chosen side — indicative, not a quote.
“From 0.0 pips” — which account is that, really?
The advertised “from 0.0” belongs to the Raw Spread account, which adds a fixed commission per side. This page measures the Standard account — the fair comparison is the all-in cost per trade:
Standard — EUR/USD
0.8 pips typical spread · no commission · min deposit none on Standard accounts. Measured reading by reading on the platform’s own feed.
Raw Spread — EUR/USD
Advertised “from 0.0 pips” plus a commission of up to $3.50 per side ≈ a $7.00 floor per round turn. It works out lower only when the raw spread really holds near zero — Raw Spread is not measured on this page.
Median spread, capture by capture (49 captures)
| Instrument | Latest | Trend | Range | Data notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 0.8 | 0.8 | — | |
| GBP/USD | 1 | 1 | — | |
| USD/JPY | 1 | 1 | — | |
| AUD/USD | 0.9 | 0.9 | — | |
| USD/CAD | 1.4 | 1.4 – 1.6 | — | |
| USD/CHF | 1.3 | 1.3 | — | |
| NZD/USD | 1.4 | 1.4 | — | |
| EUR/GBP | 1.3 | 1.3 | — | |
| EUR/JPY | 1.6 | 1.6 | — | |
| GBP/JPY | 2.2 | 2.1 – 2.7 | — | |
| AUD/JPY | 1.1 | 1.1 – 1.9 | — | |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | 26 | 24 – 26 | — | |
| XAG/USD (Silver) | 3 | 3 | — | |
| US Oil (WTI) | 2 | 2 | — | |
| UK Oil (Brent) | 4 | 3 – 4 | — | |
| US500 (S&P 500) | 40 | 40 – 129 | — | |
| US30 (Dow) | 10 | 10 – 38 | — | |
| USTEC (Nasdaq 100) | 112 | 112 – 360 | — | |
| DE30 (DAX) | 7 | 7 – 49 | — | |
| JP225 (Nikkei 225) | 31 | 31 – 64 | — | |
| UK100 (FTSE 100) | 98 | 98 – 351 | — | |
| BTC/USD | 1000 | 1000 | — | |
| ETH/USD | 100 | 100 | — |
One capture per day from the same MT5 feed. A narrow range means the median spread held steady across the period. Spreads may fluctuate and widen due to volatility, news, and market conditions.
How this was measured
The numbers above are measurements, not promises.
They come from the Standard account this page tracks — min deposit none on Standard accounts. Spreads vary with market conditions. Last updated 2026-09-11.
Frequently asked questions
Why do min, median and p90 coincide on so many instruments?
How are these Exness spreads measured?
How often is this page updated?
Do these spreads apply to any Exness account?
How much does it cost to hold a position overnight?
Why are costs shown per 0.1 lot by default?
Is a wide spread a fault?
What separates market widening from a problem on my own side?
The figure has not moved for several minutes. Is that normal?
One instrument is wide and everything else looks ordinary. What does that mean?
Does a large number mean more than a small one here?
When in the day should wide figures be expected?
Why does a spread look wrong next to a figure I remember?
Can the width of one instrument be used to judge another?
Wide is a price, not an error
The first thing a wide figure deserves is the assumption that it is correct. The width is what crossing between the two sides costs at that moment, and that cost is not constant: it rises when little is being offered on either side and falls when plenty is. A thin moment produces a wide figure, and the figure is an accurate description of the moment.
Treating width as evidence of a defect sends the search in the wrong direction. Time goes into checking something that is working perfectly well, while the actual event — a thin stretch in the market — runs its course and is over by the time the checking finishes.
The opposite mistake is just as common and much quieter: accepting an unchanging width as normal because it is not especially large. A width that never moves is a stronger signal of something being wrong than a width that briefly becomes large, and it attracts far less attention because it does not look dramatic.
Widening that comes from the market has a shape
Real widening arrives rather than sits. It builds over seconds, reaches its widest point quickly and then comes back in, and the coming back in is as informative as the widening was. A figure that behaves this way is describing an event with a beginning and an end.
It also has company. When the cause sits in the market, more than one instrument reacts at once: pairs that share a currency move together, and metals and indices join in when the cause is broad enough. A single instrument widening on its own while everything beside it carries on unchanged is a different kind of event altogether.
And it has timing. Thin stretches are not scattered at random through the day; they gather at the edges of trading sessions, at the turn of the trading day and in the hours when fewest participants are present. Width appearing at those points is unremarkable. Width appearing in the middle of the busiest hours earns a second look.
A fault on the reading side has no shape at all
The signature of a fault is stillness rather than size. Everything attached to the instrument stops changing together: both sides of the quote, the last figure, and the width between them. Nothing rises, nothing falls, and the width sits at whatever value it happened to hold when things stopped.
The second signature is isolation. A fault attached to one instrument leaves everything else on the same screen behaving normally, which is the exact inverse of market widening. A fault attached to the whole screen leaves everything equally motionless, which is the inverse of a market where instruments never move at quite the same rate.
Neither signature has anything to do with the size of the number. An ordinary width held perfectly still is a fault. A very large width that is still moving is a market. Size is what draws the eye, and behaviour is what settles the question.
What a feeling about a figure gets wrong
A width feels wrong when it is compared against a remembered figure rather than against what the instrument normally does at that hour. The remembered figure is almost always a favourable one, because favourable figures are the ones people look at, and setting a thin moment against a busy one produces alarm the market has not earned.
Instruments also differ from one another far more than intuition suggests. A width that would be extraordinary on a major currency pair is entirely ordinary on an instrument that changes hands far less often, and carrying an expectation across from one to the other manufactures a problem that exists only in the comparison.
The way past both mistakes is to stop judging a single frame. One look at the width says almost nothing. Three looks ten seconds apart say whether it is rising, falling or standing still, and that is the entire verdict.
Deciding whether a wide figure is the market or a fault
- Watch the width across three looks rather than one. Rising or falling means the market; identical across all three means something has stopped.
- Look at what sits beside it. Widening shared with related instruments is a market event; widening on one instrument alone, while its neighbours behave normally, is not.
- Ask whether it came back in. Market widening ends, so a figure standing exactly where it was several minutes ago is not describing an event.
- Place the moment in the day. The edges of trading sessions and the quietest hours produce wide figures routinely, and width at those points needs no explanation.
- Compare against what the instrument usually does, not against the most favourable figure that has ever been noticed on it.
The first step settles most cases on its own, and it costs half a minute of watching rather than any action at all.
The same wide figure, read two ways
| What the width does next | What sits beside it | What it describes |
|---|---|---|
| Builds quickly, then comes back in | Related instruments widen at the same time | A thin moment in the market |
| Widens and stays wide for a stretch | Related instruments also stay wide | A quiet period rather than a single event |
| Does not change at all | Everything else on the screen is equally still | The reading has stopped, not the market |
| Does not change at all | Everything beside it is behaving normally | Something attached to that one instrument |
| Moves normally but looks large | Nothing unusual anywhere near it | An instrument whose ordinary width is wider than expected |
The first column does the work in every row; the second only says where to look next.