CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Trade only with money you can afford to lose.
Open Exness Account →
Measured datacapture #49 · 11 Sep 2026, 07:59 server3,697,056 readings · 23 instrumentsnext capture ~07:00 UTC daily↓ CSV

Reading a Wide Spread: Market Widening or Something That Stopped — United Arab Emirates

Every figure below was recorded on Exness’s own MetaTrader 5 Standard feed by an in-terminal EA — the spread the platform actually quoted, not a marketing “from 0.0”. Dollar costs default to 0.1 lot, the size most retail accounts actually run — switch to 0.01 or 1.0 below.

XAU/USD (Gold)
26pts
$2.60 / 0.1 lot · 0.3% of daily range
EUR/USD
0.8pips
$0.80 / 0.1 lot · 2.1% of daily range
GBP/USD
1pips
$1.00 / 0.1 lot · 2.2% of daily range
BTC/USD
1000pts
$1.00 / 0.1 lot · 0.4% of daily range
Open Exness Account →

Standard account — the account measured here

A spread that looks too wide is a price before it is a problem. Widening that comes from the market has a recognisable shape: it arrives quickly, it shows up on more than one instrument at the same time, and it narrows again without anything being done about it. A fault on the reading side has none of that shape — one instrument moves while its neighbours do not, or nothing moves at all and the width simply stays where it was. The verdict comes from how the width behaves over the following minute, not from how large it looks in the first second.

Measured spreads — all 23 instruments in one table

Cost per
lot
InstrumentTypicalmin – p90Cost / 0.1 lotCost vs daily moveReadings
FX Majors
EUR/USDpips0.8— stable in sample$0.80
2.1%
29,326
GBP/USDpips1
0.9 – 1
$1.00
2.2%
46,261
USD/JPYpips1— stable in sample$0.65
0.8%
83,255
AUD/USDpips0.9— stable in sample$0.90
2.6%
20,902
USD/CADpips1.4— stable in sample$1.01
2.6%
16,970
USD/CHFpips1.3— stable in sample$1.60
2.9%
23,874
NZD/USDpips1.4— stable in sample$1.40
3.5%
16,766
FX Crosses
EUR/GBPpips1.3— stable in sample$1.76
7.7%
7,742
EUR/JPYpips1.6— stable in sample$1.04
1.3%
49,909
GBP/JPYpips2.2
2.1 – 2.2
$1.43
1.5%
59,775
AUD/JPYpips1.1— stable in sample$0.71
1.3%
43,769
Metals
XAU/USD (Gold)pts26
24 – 26
$2.60
0.3%
404,113
XAG/USD (Silver)pts3— stable in sample$15.00
1.3%
91,975
Energy
US Oil (WTI)pts2— stable in sample$2.00
0.7%
352,941
UK Oil (Brent)pts4
3.3 – 4.2
$4.00
1.1%
105,712
Indices
US500 (S&P 500)pts40— stable in sample$0.04
contract size 1
0.7%
205,958
US30 (Dow)pts10
10 – 13
$0.10
0.2%
198,487
USTEC (Nasdaq 100)pts112— stable in sample$0.11
0.3%
1,438,326
DE30 (DAX)pts7— stable in sample$0.08
contract size 1
0.3%
106,076
JP225 (Nikkei 225)pts31
31 – 34
$0.00
Quoted in Japanese yen with a contract size of 1 index unit — a small contract, so the dollar cost per lot is naturally low; matches Exness's published contract specifications.
0.2%
146,223
UK100 (FTSE 100)pts98
98 – 300
$0.13
1.1%
79,563
Crypto
BTC/USDpts1000— stable in sample$1.00
0.4%
116,911
ETH/USDpts100— stable in sample$0.10
1.1%
52,222

Typical = the median of all readings. The min–p90 strip shows how far the spread stretched under load; a stable in sample badge means the spread never moved across the whole sample — on Exness Standard many instruments are quoted with stable target spreads, so identical min, median and p90 is expected there, not an error. Forex pairs are quoted in pips; metals, indices, energy and crypto in points — the cost column converts each instrument into the dollar cost of opening the selected lot size at the typical spread. Confidence dots: ●●● at least 2,000 readings, ●● at least 800, ● below that — treat single-dot rows as indicative. Dollar costs differ in magnitude because contract sizes differ: 1 lot of JP225 (Nikkei 225) is a contract of just 1 — a fraction of other instruments’ notional — so a cost of a few cents per lot is genuine, not an error; the “cost vs daily move” column is the fair cross-instrument comparison. Server Exness-MT5Trial11, captured 11 Sep 2026, 07:59 server time.

What this means for a small account

  • Lowest entry cost relative to the daily move: JP225 (Nikkei 225) — the spread takes about 0.2% of an average day’s range ($0.00 per 0.1 lot).
  • Highest: EUR/GBP — about 7.7% of the daily move is gone on entry; short-term trades there pay a premium on Standard.
  • Widest single reading in this sample: GBP/JPY at 30.4 pips around 21:00 server — around the daily rollover — opening positions in that hour costs more.

Spread through the day

GBP/JPY — average spread by server hour. Tightest 2.19, widest 28.3 pips. Sampled 00:00–23:00 server this capture.

2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.19
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.73
6.88
28.3
5.96
2.2
000408121620
Tokyo · Asia
London
London–NY overlap
New York
rollover · thin
avg spread by server hourwidest hournot sampled in this capture

Hours are platform server time. Values are printed above each bar; hatched hours were outside this capture window — they are not zero, just not measured yet. Session bands are indicative (summer-time anchors).

Holding overnight — measured swaps

☪️
Trading swap-free? Exness offers swap-free (Islamic) status for eligible clients — where it applies, the overnight charges below do not apply. Eligibility and instrument coverage are set by the broker: see the Islamic account page.

Values shown per 0.1 lot — the lot toggle above rescales this table too.

InstrumentLong / nightShort / nightTriple dayHeld 5 nights (worse side)
EUR/USD−$0.57$0.00Wednesday ×3−$3.99
GBP/USD−$0.14−$0.14Wednesday ×3−$0.98
USD/JPY$0.00−$0.86Wednesday ×3−$6.04
AUD/USD$0.00−$0.18Wednesday ×3−$1.26
USD/CAD$0.00−$0.59Thursday ×3−$4.10
USD/CHF$0.00−$1.16Wednesday ×3−$8.09
NZD/USD−$0.39$0.00Wednesday ×3−$2.73
EUR/GBP−$0.58$0.00Wednesday ×3−$4.07
EUR/JPY$0.00−$0.58Wednesday ×3−$4.04
GBP/JPY$0.00−$1.19Wednesday ×3−$8.36
AUD/JPY−$0.01−$0.14Wednesday ×3−$1.00
XAU/USD (Gold)−$5.36$0.00Wednesday ×3−$37.51
XAG/USD (Silver)−$4.20$0.00Wednesday ×3−$29.40
US Oil (WTI)$0.00−$18.69No triple day−$93.45
UK Oil (Brent)$0.00−$21.89No triple day−$109.45
US500 (S&P 500)−$0.15$0.00Friday ×3−$1.02
US30 (Dow)−$0.96$0.00Friday ×3−$6.71
USTEC (Nasdaq 100)−$0.59$0.00Friday ×3−$4.12
DE30 (DAX)−$0.51$0.00Friday ×3−$3.55
JP225 (Nikkei 225)$0.00$0.00Friday ×3$0.00
UK100 (FTSE 100)−$0.26$0.00Friday ×3−$1.81
BTC/USD−$1.61$0.00Friday ×3−$11.26
ETH/USD−$0.05$0.00Friday ×3−$0.36

Read from the platform’s contract specifications at the same capture (2026-09-11). Negative = a nightly charge, positive = a nightly credit; on the triple-swap day three nights are applied at once. “Held 5 nights” counts 7 charges where the instrument has a triple-swap day — a Monday→Saturday hold crosses it once; energies (US Oil, UK Oil) have no triple day, so five nights mean five charges — the realistic cost of a week-long position, not the per-night teaser. See swap rates for how swaps work.

What will this position cost?

Spread on entry
Swaps (7 charges)
Total cost

Swap charges assume the worst case: each run of 7 nights crosses one triple-swap day; energies (US Oil, UK Oil) have no triple day and charge once per night. Figures combine the measured entry spread with the captured swap for the chosen side — indicative, not a quote.

“From 0.0 pips” — which account is that, really?

The advertised “from 0.0” belongs to the Raw Spread account, which adds a fixed commission per side. This page measures the Standard account — the fair comparison is the all-in cost per trade:

Measured on this page

Standard — EUR/USD

$8.00 / 1 lot

0.8 pips typical spread · no commission · min deposit none on Standard accounts. Measured reading by reading on the platform’s own feed.

Advertised, for comparison

Raw Spread — EUR/USD

≈ $7.00+ / 1 lot

Advertised “from 0.0 pips” plus a commission of up to $3.50 per side ≈ a $7.00 floor per round turn. It works out lower only when the raw spread really holds near zero — Raw Spread is not measured on this page.

Median spread, capture by capture (49 captures)

InstrumentLatestTrendRangeData notes
EUR/USD0.80.8
GBP/USD11
USD/JPY11
AUD/USD0.90.9
USD/CAD1.41.4 – 1.6
USD/CHF1.31.3
NZD/USD1.41.4
EUR/GBP1.31.3
EUR/JPY1.61.6
GBP/JPY2.22.1 – 2.7
AUD/JPY1.11.1 – 1.9
XAU/USD (Gold)2624 – 26
XAG/USD (Silver)33
US Oil (WTI)22
UK Oil (Brent)43 – 4
US500 (S&P 500)4040 – 129
US30 (Dow)1010 – 38
USTEC (Nasdaq 100)112112 – 360
DE30 (DAX)77 – 49
JP225 (Nikkei 225)3131 – 64
UK100 (FTSE 100)9898 – 351
BTC/USD10001000
ETH/USD100100

One capture per day from the same MT5 feed. A narrow range means the median spread held steady across the period. Spreads may fluctuate and widen due to volatility, news, and market conditions.

How this was measured

Broker’s own feedRecorded in-terminal on Exness’s own MetaTrader 5 Standard pricing feed — the quotes the platform itself served, not a third-party estimate.
In-terminal EAAn MQL5 expert advisor records the quoted bid and ask throughout the session; sampling density varies by instrument — quiet instruments produce fewer readings, which is why the counts differ.
VerifiableThe per-instrument summary ships as a CSV download; the dollar costs are derived from the platform’s own contract specifications.
Bounded windowA capture covers only the hours the terminal session was open — unsampled hours are shown hatched in the chart, never guessed.

The numbers above are measurements, not promises.

They come from the Standard account this page tracks — min deposit none on Standard accounts. Spreads vary with market conditions. Last updated 2026-09-11.

Open Exness Account →

Frequently asked questions

Why do min, median and p90 coincide on so many instruments?
On Exness Standard many instruments are quoted with stable target spreads — the platform can hold a pair at the same spread for an entire session, so identical min, median and p90 is expected behaviour there, not an error. Pairs like GBP/JPY and USD/JPY show real variation, which the min–p90 strip makes visible.
How are these Exness spreads measured?
An MQL5 expert advisor runs inside MetaTrader 5 on Exness's own Standard feed and records the quoted bid and ask throughout the session. The spread shown is what the platform actually quoted — not an estimate and not the advertised minimum.
How often is this page updated?
A new capture is taken daily (around 07:00 UTC) and the page is rebuilt with it. The current figures come from 3,697,056 readings recorded up to 2026-09-11 on server Exness-MT5Trial11.
Do these spreads apply to any Exness account?
The figures track the Standard account. Other account types price differently, and spreads are variable: they widen around high-impact news and the daily rollover, and past readings do not guarantee future spreads.
How much does it cost to hold a position overnight?
Combine the entry spread with the nightly swap for the chosen direction — the position-cost calculator above does exactly that for any lot size and number of nights, including the triple-swap day where the instrument has one (energies charge once per night, with no triple day). Swap-free (Islamic) status, where it applies, removes the overnight charges.
Why are costs shown per 0.1 lot by default?
Most retail positions run 0.01–0.1 lots, so a per-1-lot figure overstates the cost a typical account actually pays. The toggle above the table rescales every dollar figure to 0.01, 0.1 or 1.0 lots; the CSV keeps raw per-1-lot values.
Is a wide spread a fault?
Usually not. The width is what crossing between the two sides costs at that moment, and it rises when little is being offered. A wide figure is a description of a thin moment, and thin moments are an ordinary part of a trading day.
What separates market widening from a problem on my own side?
Behaviour over the following minute. Market widening arrives, peaks and comes back in, and it usually shows on several related instruments at once. A problem on the reading side produces a width that does not change at all.
The figure has not moved for several minutes. Is that normal?
It is the one pattern worth acting on. A market that has genuinely stopped charging differently is far rarer than a reading that has stopped being refreshed, so an unchanging figure is the stronger signal of the two.
One instrument is wide and everything else looks ordinary. What does that mean?
That the cause is attached to that instrument rather than to the market. Broad causes move related instruments together, so isolation points away from the market and towards the particular symbol being watched.
Does a large number mean more than a small one here?
No. Size draws the eye and behaviour settles the question. An ordinary width held perfectly still is the more serious observation; a very large width that is still moving is simply an expensive moment.
When in the day should wide figures be expected?
At the edges of trading sessions and in the quietest hours, when fewest participants are present. Width at those points needs no further explanation, while width in the middle of the busiest hours earns a second look.
Why does a spread look wrong next to a figure I remember?
Because the remembered figure is almost always a favourable one. Setting a thin moment against a busy one produces alarm the market has not earned; the useful comparison is against what the same instrument normally does at the same hour.
Can the width of one instrument be used to judge another?
Only loosely. Instruments differ from each other far more than intuition suggests, and a width that would be remarkable on one is ordinary on another. Expectations carried across create problems that exist only in the comparison.

Wide is a price, not an error

The first thing a wide figure deserves is the assumption that it is correct. The width is what crossing between the two sides costs at that moment, and that cost is not constant: it rises when little is being offered on either side and falls when plenty is. A thin moment produces a wide figure, and the figure is an accurate description of the moment.

Treating width as evidence of a defect sends the search in the wrong direction. Time goes into checking something that is working perfectly well, while the actual event — a thin stretch in the market — runs its course and is over by the time the checking finishes.

The opposite mistake is just as common and much quieter: accepting an unchanging width as normal because it is not especially large. A width that never moves is a stronger signal of something being wrong than a width that briefly becomes large, and it attracts far less attention because it does not look dramatic.

Widening that comes from the market has a shape

Real widening arrives rather than sits. It builds over seconds, reaches its widest point quickly and then comes back in, and the coming back in is as informative as the widening was. A figure that behaves this way is describing an event with a beginning and an end.

It also has company. When the cause sits in the market, more than one instrument reacts at once: pairs that share a currency move together, and metals and indices join in when the cause is broad enough. A single instrument widening on its own while everything beside it carries on unchanged is a different kind of event altogether.

And it has timing. Thin stretches are not scattered at random through the day; they gather at the edges of trading sessions, at the turn of the trading day and in the hours when fewest participants are present. Width appearing at those points is unremarkable. Width appearing in the middle of the busiest hours earns a second look.

A fault on the reading side has no shape at all

The signature of a fault is stillness rather than size. Everything attached to the instrument stops changing together: both sides of the quote, the last figure, and the width between them. Nothing rises, nothing falls, and the width sits at whatever value it happened to hold when things stopped.

The second signature is isolation. A fault attached to one instrument leaves everything else on the same screen behaving normally, which is the exact inverse of market widening. A fault attached to the whole screen leaves everything equally motionless, which is the inverse of a market where instruments never move at quite the same rate.

Neither signature has anything to do with the size of the number. An ordinary width held perfectly still is a fault. A very large width that is still moving is a market. Size is what draws the eye, and behaviour is what settles the question.

What a feeling about a figure gets wrong

A width feels wrong when it is compared against a remembered figure rather than against what the instrument normally does at that hour. The remembered figure is almost always a favourable one, because favourable figures are the ones people look at, and setting a thin moment against a busy one produces alarm the market has not earned.

Instruments also differ from one another far more than intuition suggests. A width that would be extraordinary on a major currency pair is entirely ordinary on an instrument that changes hands far less often, and carrying an expectation across from one to the other manufactures a problem that exists only in the comparison.

The way past both mistakes is to stop judging a single frame. One look at the width says almost nothing. Three looks ten seconds apart say whether it is rising, falling or standing still, and that is the entire verdict.

Deciding whether a wide figure is the market or a fault

  1. Watch the width across three looks rather than one. Rising or falling means the market; identical across all three means something has stopped.
  2. Look at what sits beside it. Widening shared with related instruments is a market event; widening on one instrument alone, while its neighbours behave normally, is not.
  3. Ask whether it came back in. Market widening ends, so a figure standing exactly where it was several minutes ago is not describing an event.
  4. Place the moment in the day. The edges of trading sessions and the quietest hours produce wide figures routinely, and width at those points needs no explanation.
  5. Compare against what the instrument usually does, not against the most favourable figure that has ever been noticed on it.

The first step settles most cases on its own, and it costs half a minute of watching rather than any action at all.

The same wide figure, read two ways

What the width does nextWhat sits beside itWhat it describes
Builds quickly, then comes back inRelated instruments widen at the same timeA thin moment in the market
Widens and stays wide for a stretchRelated instruments also stay wideA quiet period rather than a single event
Does not change at allEverything else on the screen is equally stillThe reading has stopped, not the market
Does not change at allEverything beside it is behaving normallySomething attached to that one instrument
Moves normally but looks largeNothing unusual anywhere near itAn instrument whose ordinary width is wider than expected

The first column does the work in every row; the second only says where to look next.

Related Exness pages